Parresia logo
Rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Numéro 254 (Juin 2011) Actual. Odonto-Stomatol., 254 (2011) 113-120 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Actual. Odonto-Stomatol.
Numéro 254, Juin 2011
Page(s) 113 - 120
Section Odontologie conservatrice
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/aos/2011203
Publié en ligne 8 juin 2011
  1. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heyman HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34:97-105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blunck U, Knitter K, Jahn K. Six month clinical evaluation of XP BOND in non carious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:265-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, Iwaku M. Non-pressure adhesion of a new restorative system. J Dent Res 1979;59:1364-70. [Google Scholar]
  5. Degrange M, Roulet JF. Minimally invasive dentistry with bonding. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  6. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:846-53. [Google Scholar]
  7. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2step and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:47-56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Munck J, Van Meerbeeck B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microtensile bond strength of one-and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003;16:414-20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cardoso PEC, Sadek FT. Microtensile bond strength on dentin using new adhesive systems with self-etching primers. Braz J Oral Sc 2003;2:156-9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Degrange M. Les adhésifs qui requièrent un mordançage préalable sont-ils obsolètes? Inf Dent 2007;4:1-7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Braem M. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:(1) 690-702. [Google Scholar]
  12. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:593-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schwartz RS, Haveman CW, Conn LJ, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Clinical evaluation of a one bottle adhesive. J Dent Res 1998;77:297 (Abstr. 1534). [Google Scholar]
  14. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. The effect of enamel bevel on the microleakage of cervical resin composites. Dent Mater 2002 (p. 252 [Abstr. 117]). [Google Scholar]
  15. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006;34(2):97-105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. American Dental Association-Council on Scientific Affairs. Acceptance Program Guidelines-Restorative Materials; March 1996. (available at: http://www.ada.org/prof/ resources/positions/standards/ guide_restormaterials.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  17. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of an all in one bonding system to non carious cervical lesion-a results at one year. Austr Dent J 2003;48(3):180-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landyut K,Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:7-10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Santiago SL, Franco EB, Mendonsa JS, Lauris JRP, Navarro MF. One-year clinical evaluation of tooth-colored materials in non carious cervical lesions. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11(3):175-80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Van Dijken JWV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions. J Dent 2000;16:285-91. [Google Scholar]